An unillustrated herbal describing the healing properties of plants, including a short text on the properties of the herb betony, traditionally attributed to Antonius Musa, and a compilation of herbal remedies drawing from Greek and Latin sources, traditionally attributed to Apuleius Madaurensis or Apuleius Platonis. On paper, produced in Northern Italy, about 1460s-1480s.
Contents:
1. ff. 1r-5r: Pseudo-Antonius Musa, De herba vettonica liber, a short treatise on the virtues and properties of the herb betony. The text was widespread during Late Antiquity and the early Middle Ages. Traditionally attributed to Antonius Musa, the physician of Emperor Octavianus Augustus, it is in fact of unknown origin and dates to the 4th or 5th century AD: see M. Collins, Medieval Herbals: The Illustrative Traditions (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2000), p. 166.
First printed without the prologue as the first plant in the Herbarium Apulei by Johannes Philippus de Lignamine in Rome about 1481-82 (ISTC ih00058000).
Listed in eTK, A digital resource based on Lynn Thorndike and Pearl Kibre, A Catalogue of Incipits of Medieval Scientific Writings in Latin (Cambridge, MA: Mediaeval Academy, 1963; with supplements in 1965 and 1968; online at https://medievalacademy.site-ym.com/?page=Books#etk), no. 629L.
Edited in E. Howald and H. E. Sigerist, Antonii Musae De herba Vettonica liber. Pseudoapulei Herbarius. Anonymi De taxone liber. Sexti Placiti Liber medicinae ex animalibus, etc. (Lipsiae: Teubnerus, 1927), pp. 3-11.
For the prefatory letter, see L. Zurli, 'L'epistola dello Ps. Antonius Musa', in Prefazioni, prologhi, proemi di opere tecnico-scientifiche latine, ed. C. Santini and N. Scivoletto, 2 vols (Rome: Herder, 1990-1992), II, pp. 431-42.
In the present manuscript the prefatory letter differs from that edited by Howald and Sigerist, whereas the text probably belongs to class β [beta] of the textual tradition and ends with chapter 47, 'Ad podagram': see Howald and Sigerist, Antonii Musae De herba Vettonica liber …, pp. 3-4 and 10.
For other manuscript copies of this treatise in the Wellcome Library, see MSS 573 (ff. 3v-6r, and 148v-149r; late 13th century) and 574 (ff. 2r-v and 16r-v; early 15th century).
f. 1r: Prefatory letter, Incipit: [A]NTONIVS MVSA Agrippe. / Magno çesari augusto salutem / Hoc cure meum experimentum et omnium medicorum dissiplinas [sic] et usu ordinatum ...
f. 1v, lines 8-9: Prefatory letter, Explicit: … in pulverem redactam cum volueris utere sicut sictis [sic].
f. 1v, lines 9-12: Incipit: [rubric in red] Jncipiunt uirtutes Bectonice [end of rubric] / [line 11] [N]Omen herbe bectonice amoeos cosfos [?]. Alij acore …
f. 5r, lines 15-19: Explicit: [rubric in red] Ad podagram [end of rubric] / Herbam bectonicam decoctam … mirifice dolorem tollit. nos experti affirniamus [sic] [The text corresponds to chapter 47 in Howald and Sigerist, Antonii Musae De herba Vettonica liber … , p. 10].
2. ff. 5v-52v: Pseudo-Apuleius Platonicus, Herbarium or De medicaminibus herbarum liber. This herbal, also widespread during Late Antiquity and the early Middle Ages, was traditionally attributed to Apuleius Madaurensis or Apuleius Platonis. It is, in fact, a compilation of herbal remedies drawing from Greek and Latin sources put together by an anonymous compiler in the 4th century AD (about 350-395 AD) and possibly revised sometime in the 7th century: see G. Maggiulli and M.F. Buffa Giolito, L'altro Apuleio. Problemi aperti per una nuova edizione dell' 'Herbarius' (Naples: Loffredo Editore, 1996), pp. 11-32; M. Collins, Medieval Herbals …, pp. 165-7.
First printed as the Herbarium Apulei by Johannes Philippus de Lignamine in Rome about 1481-82 (ISTC ih00058000).
Listed in eTK as nos 117D and 117E, and 535D for the prefatory letter.
Edited in Howald and Sigerist, Antonii Musae De herba Vettonica liber …, pp. 15-225.
The present copy of the treatise is not illustrated. The text probably belongs to class β [beta] of its textual tradition, with the prologue seemingly close to the text found in Vatican City, Vatican Library, MS. Barb. lat. 160 (known as Va), an 11th-century manuscript in Beneventan script, probably produced in Southern Italy or the southern coastal region of Croatia (historical Dalmatia), by comparison with the texts edited in Maggiulli and Buffa Giolito L'altro Apuleio…, passim, and pp. 112, 114 for the prologue.
The text includes the usual 131 chapters, each describing the appearance, peculiarities and healing properties of individual plants from plantago to the mandragora, with the addition of a chapter dedicated to saxifraga. The chapters are found in the following order (according to Howald and Sigerist, and Maggiulli and Buffa Giolito): 1-67, 74, 68-73, 75-97, saxifraga, 98-112, 115, 113-114, 116-131.
For other manuscript copies of this treatise in the Wellcome Library, see MSS 573 (ff. 6v-37r; late 13th century) and 574 (early 15th century).
f. 5v, lines 1-23: Prologue: [rubric in red] APVLEGII [sic] pLATONICI HER/barum incipit / Epistula // Apulegius platonicus ad ciues suos [end of rubric] / [E]x pluribus pauca uires herbarum et curationes corporis ... nostra bectonica scientia invitis etiam medicis profuisse videatur.
f. 5v, lines 24-25: Incipit: [rubric in red] plantago [end of rubric] / [N]omen herbe plantago. … in pulverem redactam cum volueris utere sicut sictis [sic].
f. 52r-v: Explicit: [rubric in red] Mandragora [end of rubric] / [N]omen mandragora herba. Huius generis [sic] sunt duo. Masculus et femina. Albiora habet folia masculus … Radices autem sicce reseruantur pluribus usibus profuture. /Finis.